The proliferation of new technologies has meant an apparent absence of limits on all illegal conduct carried out through those tools, as well as the possibility of understanding the invulnerability of certain structures related to the spread of information through the Internet. For this reason, the main question of this article is focused on understanding the extension and way in which the responsibility of the service providers is required. In this regard, apart from dealing with this question from a criminological and criminal law perspective, specifically in relation to crimes related to intellectual property (Article 270 of the Criminal Code) and crimes related to the exercise of fundamental rights (Article 510 of the Criminal Code) because of its measures in relation to providers, the truth is that the contextualization of the work cannot avoid the analysis of a more comprehensive legislative treatment that highlights, among others, the Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, the Law 34/2002 of 11 July 2000 on Information Society Service and Electronic Commerce, or Law 21/2014, of November 4, amending the consolidated text of the Law on Intellectual Property, approved by Royal Legislative Decree No. 1/1996 of April 12.

The proliferation of new technologies has meant an apparent absence of limits on all illegal conduct carried out through those tools, as well as the possibility of understanding the invulnerability of certain structures related to the spread of information through the Internet. For this reason, the main question of this article is focused on understanding the extension and way in which the responsibility of the service providers is required. In this regard, apart from dealing with this question from a criminological and criminal law perspective, specifically in relation to crimes related to intellectual property (Article 270 of the Criminal Code) and crimes related to the exercise of fundamental rights (Article 510 of the Criminal Code) because of its measures in relation to providers, the truth is that the contextualization of the work cannot avoid the analysis of a more comprehensive legislative treatment that highlights, among others, the Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, the Law 34/2002 of 11 July 2000 on Information Society Service and Electronic Commerce, or Law 21/2014, of November 4, amending the consolidated text of the Law on Intellectual Property, approved by Royal Legislative Decree No. 1/1996 of April 12.

Palabras Clave:
Internet, prestador de servicios, delitos relativos a la propiedad intelectual, delitos relativos al ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales, Ley 34/2002 de Servicios de la Sociedad de la Información y de Comercio Electrónico, Ley 21/2004 de Prop. Intel.

Keywords:
Internet, service provider, crimes related to intellectual property, crimes related to the exercise of fundamental rights, Law 34/2002 on Information Society Service and Electronic Commerce, Law 21/2014 on Intellectual Property

índice:

I. CUESTIONES PRELIMINARES. II. ACERCA DE LOS PRESTADORES DE SERVICIOS. III. CONTEXTUALIZACIÓN, UBICACIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS TIPOS PENALES QUE VINCULAN A LOS PRESTADORES DE SERVICIOS DEL ART. 270 Y DEL ART. 510 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL. 1. Delitos relativos a la propiedad intelectual e industrial, al mercado y a los consumidores. 1.1. Características generales de las dos primeras Secciones del Capítulo XI del Título XIII del Código Penal. 1.2. De los delitos relativos a la propiedad intelectual. 1.2.1. Particularidades. 1.2.2. Especial mención a los intermediarios. 1.2.3. Disposiciones comunes. 1.2.4. La relevancia de las leyes extrapenales en la comprensión del tipo. 2. De los delitos relativos al ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales y libertades públicas. 2.1. Características generales del Capítulo IV de Título XXI. 2.2. De los delitos cometidos con ocasión del ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales y de las libertades públicas garantizadas por la Constitución. IV. COMPARATIVA SOBRE LA OBLIGATORIEDAD DE LOS PRESTADORES DE SERVICIO EN LA CONFIGURACIÓN DE LOS ARTÍCULOS 270 Y 510 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL. 1. Obligaciones y responsabilidades de los servidores (de acceso y alojamiento). 2. Técnica legislativa y análisis comparativo entre los tipos penales. V. ¿LA MAYOR BENEVOLENCIA DEL LEGISLADOR EN RELACIÓN A LAS CONSECUENCIAS IMPUESTAS A LOS PRESTADORES DE SERVICIOS QUE ATENTAN CONTRA LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL SE DEBE AL BIEN VULNERADO?

Número de descargas: 0